Endangered Languages Essay Sample free essay sample

Many linguistic communications are at the danger of disappearing. The ground of their extinction could be the lessening in a figure of people talking that linguistic communication. A 85 % of 6000 linguistic communications appear to be spoken in 25 states ( NOW 2000 ) . Language extinction is caused by external and internal factors. Internal forces such as community’s negative behavior to mother linguistic communication. or merely diminish in the figure of talkers are chiefly derived from factors such as military. economic. spiritual and cultural issues ( Brenzinger. Graaf ) . Many people claim that disposal ought to back up endangered linguistic communications by funding programmes that are dedicated to continue these linguistic communications. But some argue that salvaging linguistic communications at extinction is merely the loss of clip and money. Further will be discussed whether endangered linguistic communications should be protected from extinction or endangered linguis tic communications should be neglected and people should talk one common linguistic communication. First and the most influential statement of protagonists of monolingual system are the high fiscal parts to multilingual system in the state. If a state has diverseness of linguistic communications within its boundary lines state spends a batch of money to finance the different instruction undertakings. edifice separate schools. instructors. Because for the state to be thriving and crystalline authorities should handle all the nationalities reasonably. This concerns minority linguistic communication users excessively. It is non a job if the affair is five or seven different linguistic communication. But when it comes to more than two 100 different linguistic communications state of affairs becomes intolerable. It means more instructors. more stuffs. more disbursement on the same thing but in different linguistic communication. Money wasted to back up endangered linguistic communications and spent on the grounds discussed supra could be invested other more of import installations in a peculiar state. It would be more cost efficient if people within the state used merely one linguistic communication. Government could keep st andardized system with no interlingual rendition from one linguistic communication to another and could salvage enormous money by diminishing disbursement on handling each linguistic communication users individually. Fewer assortment of linguistic communication means fewer parts to education installations such as multilingual schools and colleges. stuffs published and surely less incommodiousness among people pass oning with each other. Even international trades could be done without interpreting legal paperss from one linguistic communication to another. Another statement to back up the use of one linguistic communication is the easiness of communicating between people. In order to larn some scientific discipline. travel to other states and make a concern in different states people should pass great figure of clip. immense amount of money and unrealized attempt to larn needful linguistic communications. Furthermore linguistic communication acquisition is non easy procedure. as it seems to be. So diffident disbursement and lending so much if there are already a common linguistic communication that can be understood by everyone easy. One illustration to this could be the English linguistic communi cation with its international use form that is used widely in a batch of states which gives opportunity to pass on freely. However being able to easy pass on and be efficiencies have their advantages. In malice of the facts proposed above. authorities should see stairss to salvage linguistic communications that are seldom spoken. A linguistic communication is non merely the tool for communicating. Language plays critical function in cultural. traditional. and national look. By back uping linguistic communications disposal protects its society from debasement. Language is the contemplation of a cultural heritage of a state. Language disappearing means that traditions. civilization and national and cultural diverseness will be lost everlastingly. The disappearing of a linguistic communication leads to decease of the state. Language is called dead when there is no longer talkers of that linguistic communication be. Experience accumulated through the centuries. accomplishments that are passed from male parent to boy and value that made up from the synergism that was created among native talker all of these could be buried with the last talker of any endangered linguistic communication. Human being can loss its valuable property ( linguistic communication ) as did with endangered animate beings. These are things t hat can non be bought with money afterwards. Fair intervention to every citizen could be another ground of salvaging and back uping endangered linguistic communications. At the extremum of the civilisation states should take attention of their citizens rights and back up their freedom and cultural individuality. Because every citizen is the member of a community. pays revenue enhancements and contributes to the well-being and safety of his place state. Therefore authorities should prosecute the aim of sustainable development handling all cultural minorities’ linguistic communications reasonably and supplying necessary conditions such as support schools. back uping political positions and supplying chances to talkers of a peculiar linguistic communication. In decision I want to add that if the society is in a pursue of the short term ends such as being efficient by cutting costs. do life a spot easier by shriveling the figure of linguistic communication that society surely should see bettering merely dominant linguistic c ommunication and decrease the use of the remainder. But whoever considers sustainable. booming and long-run development with a cultural and transnational diverseness within the state should waive some material benefits in the short tally. Mentions NWO Advisory Committee. October 2000. Endangered Language Research an Overview Proposals. The Netherlands hypertext transfer protocol: //www. nwo. nl/files. nsf/pages/NWOP_62UJQP/ $ file/GW % 20Programmatekst % 20ELP % 202004. pdf Tjeerd de Graaf. Matthias Brenzinger. DOCUMENTING ENDANGERED LANGUAGES AND MAINTAINING LANGUAGE DIVERSITY. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems ( EOLSS ) LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY hypertext transfer protocol: //www. eolss. net/Sample-Chapters/C04/E6-20B-10-03. pdf